Airstrike (edomination s edition)

Roll and Smoke

Markuin

Airstrike (edomination s edition) | Tweet

Published in Cuba - Social interactions and entertainment - 16 - 04 Jun 20 01:58

ï»¿Proposal for Airstrike proper function.
I suggest to edom administrationï»¿ that airstrike will have to be renewed at the same time with bonus reshuffle at 1/1. So every country will be capable ONLY once at three months using the airstrike. Airstrike will exist as law with 90 edom days cooldown . ONLY each country cp could propose as law the airstrike function.After the cooldown ending the airstrike will be renewed at 1/1 .If a country didnt use the law proposal for airstrike could not collect Airstrikes .So every country couldnt haveÂ above 1 airstrike ever.In that way strategic character of game wont be violated.Airstrike will exist as law with 500 gold cost.If law doesnt pass , a country will be able vote again until the law passed.But only CP of each country will have the capability to strike wherever wants.Target wont be known in public.Cp will have 48 hours to strike after law passing.

Support

Admiral Firmus Piett YutuKaron Ahmad Shah Massoud

Comments (16)

04 Jun 20 02:02

N4zGuL

Big no on this one . Other platforms tried it and it destroyed diversity in game. No need to populate other countries when you can stay at your own and airstrike at will. Big no no .

04 Jun 20 02:11

Markuin

Airstrike with strategic charachter will be usefyll , airstrike with no straegic charachter will be destructive .There is big diference at the way of using it . If airstrike can be used with a proper limit , will be good for the game.Airstrike with no limits will be destructive .

04 Jun 20 02:12

Admiral Firmus Piett

Interesting o/

04 Jun 20 02:23

count zero

i prefer naval battles

04 Jun 20 02:25

del boy

not bad

04 Jun 20 02:26

whisky warrior

why not? Only thing thats destroying this game is concentration of power only on one side. We can try, if it wont be good, administration can always remove the option.

04 Jun 20 02:36

Ahmad Shah Massoud

I like it

04 Jun 20 02:43

Franky Four Fingers

I was AGAINST it when Ireland was on losing side and i still say NO when we are in the biggest alliance. I dont know who is gonna benefit airstrike. Small countries? 500g cost is too big for them, they will invest in MPPs and having colony without a border wont improve their bonus. Only Proxy will use it. Bigger countries landing on small countries just to have a base to harass another big country? No, thanks. I feel You are just thinking about Your personal goals because Airstrike wont help anyone but You.

04 Jun 20 02:53

Markuin

Example ,if China and Colombia have decided to strike at middle of the Balkans for attacking at Bosnia, Albania and Repuluc of Moldava ,then they will be enforced to play in different alliances to secure the best bonuses for theirselves.

04 Jun 20 02:56

Markuin

The small countries can attack in other territories to secure some easy not wanted bonuses.All of these in are based in condition that airstrike will be strictly limited .