Published in Canada
- Warfare analysis - 12 - 16 Mar 21 04:16
Support
IzN0GooDGrandpaGeogeoGugulethudel boyVISAComments (12)


I said overall dmg, not overall dmg against Canada. We had 2 fronts if you dont remember correctly. But due to your request, I will start battles at our prime time instead of yours cause I no longer feel sorry for you. Dont come to me again just like the previous week when you came crying to me for NAP. Thank You all allies for Your help O7

Canadian allies care less than Swedish allies, got the message loud and clear!

@Thylen you complain about fighting two fronts, yet your the one who declared on two countries??? Yes I came to you about a White Peace, because Canada is peaceful nation, not the one that starts wars.

I am not complaining, Im stating the facts since You dont want to in your article. I am merely guiding you towards actual information that you seem to ignore in your article. And again, I am not the one writing 20 pages long articles, im just replying to YOUR complaining.

You claimed you could beat us 1 on 1, you claim your overall dmg (when talking about Canada/Sweden, considering I said every battle 1 on 1) was more. But once I point out your wrong, you say it is because you are fighting two fronts. That is your choice, since you declared on two peaceful countries. But keep thinking your stronk ;) I like how you are getting defensive when your shown that your wrong.

Look man, I am having fun and im just responding to your teasing. Sweden and Canada are both strong countries, population considered. From the beginning my point was OVERALL dmg, not dmg in canada front, so youre in the wrong on this point. If Sweden had only 1 front with you, we would have more overall dmg on these fronts than you. Its a fact, and if you deny it then youre in denial. And wow, you really are mad arent you? its a game, breathe a little.





Is this article still up? I thought it might be taken down when the glaring error was shown....