[Proposal] Old/New Changes |

Published in Brazil - First steps in eDominations - 10 - 04 Jun 21 15:16

https://i.imgur.com/9Ur4sRI.png

Support

GrandpaDeutschLegendDeutschLegendDeutschLegendE HartmannDelictroThylenThylenThylenThylenSenju KenshinSenju KenshinFart SinatraIzN0GooD

Comments (10)

04 Jun 21 15:34
DeutschLegend

The whole genre is stuck in a loop and the admins are just trying to prevent the inevitable by continuing to kicking the ball further down. They need to start taking risks and do SOMETHING. Any action is better than inaction at this point

04 Jun 21 16:32
Thylen

1. Kind of neutral on this one. This would be a good change in the times when Colombia was populated by most of the server. But then again, I guess it would distribute players throughout countries (kind of forcing it tho...). 2. Too much micromanagement for the already encumbered HQs. If Admin makes it less stressful on HQ, it would be great. 3. yes 4. yes and yes. Mercenary unit option on MUs would be a great feature in this case (and something unique) 5. yes 6. To be clear, Ive given 3 other examples, and it was mainly to stimulate a response in this matter (Ive exaggerated on the dmg, I agree). Your idea is way better though, THIS is good! Overall good suggestions mate O7

04 Jun 21 17:00
Malpicci

Thank you, Thylen. Ive put CGRM proposal because if we limit MPPs we are going to see people moving to big countries which would lead us to have a 2 side war again. My intention is to distribute people so we can have more small wars, but always having wars. But thank you for you ideas over my proposal, I hope more people show their own opinions over that matter. o7

04 Jun 21 20:42
Aridanra

Old proposals: (1) No. The new weapon bonus reshuffle is bad to spread players around. (2) No. Regional infrastructures will make us defend more RWs, and defending RW is boring. Your proposals: (1) I am neutral on this one, because of the new weapon bonus reshuffle. (2) No. There is already no gold rewarded in non-allies battles. Reducing the damage will make it less attractive. (3) Yes. There should be a cooldown after cancelling an MPP. However, this will not change anything significant to the game activity. (4) Yes. Anything that can increase the damage dealt is encouraging players to have more activities. My final considerations: I agree with PortgasAce, the whole genre is stuck in a loop. I think the game company should hire some new professionals out there in RL. Maybe 7 people will be enough (1 strategic planner, 1 marketing analyst, 1 salesperson, 1 full-stack engineer, 1 graphic designer, 1 data analyst, 1 game tester/business analyst).

04 Jun 21 21:02
Malpicci

@Aridanra, I think I was not very clear when I wrote the article but the changes should be visualized as a combo. Sure, I didnt like the new bonus reshuffle, it made weapons bonuses TOO RARE. However, if we give more regions with weapon bonuses we can implement at least CGRM and the other proposals I made. See, the thing is that we need to focus in having more wars, and it will only happen if we difficult countries to have 20 allies. We should have at least 3 or 4 alliances with 5-6 members, with small/medium/large sized countries. And MY second proposal is in case we reduce MPPs, it will make only the countries that have MPP to hit in DWs. Basically, all MY proposals should be implemented together because they complete each other, that is also why putting a cooldown in MPPs would make sense. Changes are kinda complex.

05 Jun 21 08:54
1224333

Delete org free working tokens

06 Jun 21 10:54
Komita

Okay delete orgs but give me back my money ;) And Kvothe isnt Cris ? 🤨

06 Jun 21 21:49
Aridanra

@Malpicci: Reducing the number of MPPs will make players group up in some countries, it has been implemented in another game. About adding more wars, people are just getting bored because this whole kind of game is stuck in a loop. I think more wars will happen if there are more players and the game is not stuck in a loop. For these to happen, the game company should analyze their own game, having a vision for (at least) the next 5 years, doing the right advertisement. then implementing some new things/events.

06 Jun 21 23:14
Malpicci

@Aridanra, yes, reducing MPP should make players group up in a few countries but if applied with CGRM proposal we punish countries with too much people and people would be forced to divide in different countries. All that would people fight more. PS: It is necessary to remove ORG relocation. We are about to see the same thing that happens every 3 months, countries allow one country to have 100% in weps and they all move their ORGs their. This is BS. The game should not allow it, that is why we are going to keep seeing farm and less wars.

14 Jun 21 08:47
Profesora

That is complete nonsence