Published in Ireland
- Battle orders - 18 - 13 Jun 21 17:34
Support
ImperatorComments (18)



I was searching Canadian sign in agreements article and I didnt find it. No NAP. Keep crying for losing regions

What you would know SM this is about Canada.... If Canada is relying on that defence then what can I say....

I am not surprised you would defend the actions of NAP breakers. That shows the trustworthiness that you have, I would not let you walk my dog around the block

When Greece broke our NAP noone care. Now same. How you tell to us? Dont cri baby




We have to take printscreens now because some delete their official signature comments...



Tbh Ireland wasnt even mentioned in the NAP article, so... even though Canada broke it, Ireland crying is kinda funny lol so, what is going to be the punishment? War? Cry on world chat? More articles? Be specific, please. PS: Im sorry for Thylen and respect him a lot because Ive had to deal with people with mental issues in alliance HQ before, and it is clear that Brisleain needs urgent treatment.


Some people are under the misunderstanding this statement is an Irish Gov statement. The NAP broken was between Sweden and Canada. Sweden is a proud member of the Dominus Entente alliance. Also Slovenia, Ireland and Australia are members. So the fact the statement is published by an Irish account is does not mean Ireland was be part of the NAP. Just that the wronged Party was part of the same alliance. I hope that clears up the confusion. Now however on behalf of the Irelanda Government I can state we are fully supportive of our alliance comrades in their grievance.

@WHS, how is that an Irish statement but was signed by DE HQ and not Irish Gov? Also, for sure Ireland was not mentioned in the NAP, but in this article Bris said that Ireland was going to be the one reclaiming its colonies. This is bad PR. I can see that it wasnt even unanimous the Sweden DoW which can show many things. Well, whatever...

Hi Malpicci I can only guess that English is not your first language as my previous post answered exactly the point and misunderstanding you refer to. The Statement is a DE statement... it refers to the breaking of the NAP of Sweden by Canada. Ireland is a member of the Alliance. The breaking of the NAP has consequences and that is referred to underneath. The alliance is notifying Canada of the consequence... that is all..

So Canada broke a NAP with Sweden, but Ireland will be the one taking back its colonies ? Shouldnt Sweden be the one to ? Doesnt seem like you guys passed Public Relations 101 x)