Constraint to happiness

Log in Register

Radiofrequency Carcinogenicity Research Study |

Published in Japan - Social interactions and entertainment - 2 - 02 Sep 21 01:05

The U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP), released a partial report on parts of the world’s largest,most thorough and well-designed study of its type - at a cost of $25 million - on the potential carcinogenicity of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in rats and mice.

What did the study find?
The study found adverse effects after long term exposure to cell phone radiation:

● Increased incidences of glioma (a rare, aggressive and highly malignant brain cancer) as well as
schwannoma (a rare tumor of the nerve sheath) of the heart were found in both sexes of rats, but
reached statistical significance only in males.
● Increased incidences of rare, proliferative changes in glial cells of the brain and in Schwann cells
(nerve sheath) in the heart of both sexes of rats, while not a single unexposed control animal
developed these precancerous changes.
● DNA damage was induced with both modulations of radiofrequency radiation (RFR) in both rats
and mice (mixed results in tissues and brain regions).
● Results from this study clearly show that biological impacts occur at non-thermal exposures like
those that take place from cell phones today.

Are studies in animals relevant to humans and useful for assessing human risk?
Yes.
Animals and humans exhibit similarities in biological processes of disease induction, and the
pharmaceutical industry relies on the results of animals studies prior to conducting clinical trials of new
drugs in humans.
● It is unethical to intentionally expose humans to environmental agents that cause cancer in
animals.
● Every agent that is known to cause cancer in humans has been shown to be carcinogenic in
animals when adequately tested.
● Almost one-third of human carcinogens were identified after carcinogenic effects were found in
well-conducted animal studies.
● The careful control of exposure conditions in animal studies can eliminate the potential impact of
confounding factors on the interpretation of study results.

Source - RadiofrequencyCarcinogenicity Research Study

Support

MistiQMistiQVegaMistiQMistiQMajkaFritezaspageAndrzej3000Borci7Hitsuga

Comments (2)

02 Sep 21 03:08
Partisan

28

03 Sep 21 02:24
Ursa Major

Sure. Because we dont have food and water which causes cancer already. Cancer appeared when people started use cellphones. There was no cancer before. Also the Sun is made made from billions of cellphones, it causes 30 cancer cases per 100k people.