Published in Poland
- Warfare analysis - 12 - 16 Nov 17 04:10
Support
jukaSavantDreamPersecutorCelioMGL1916Comments (12)



o7 salute!! Its Time to show our Great potential for Long period of Time in a Full scale war !

@DreSanu no no we re going on crusade to Jerusalem ;) this is our main goal ;)

Nope:D Lemme tell you the plan, you drop some regions in sweden to reduce dmg reduction, then you wait for hugary to also lose some slovakian regions and for them to regain the border with us. Next you wait for a 3rd country, which will probably be Turkey, to join you two, and you will finally be brave enough to go into a 3v1 against us like last time. o7

Bravo ;) but it s not 3v1, it s WAR vs Phalanx, and in this conflict you re the aggressor :P

It pretty easy when you do not even need a plan or strategy, you just use numbers in your advantage :D And btw for me its not a real war vs Poland, since its actually Poland + your 17MPP with hun+tur also in direct attack vs Romania + our 8 MPP ;)

But after all it doesnt matter, we already got used to your alliance style of attacking 2-3vs1 so see you on the battlefield.


@Janusz My friend, you maybe are too young into politics of this game or perhaps you just listen too much at cheap propaganda by your turk alliance leaders, but that 5v1 direct was actually our 10 aegis countries vs about 19-20 countries as rest of the world (aka neutralia) ... And we cant complain, aegis started the war, lost it and dissolved. After that you had a chance of creating new alliance, new sides, new fronts, make things interesting ...But you kept that cancerous huge alliance(unoficially ofc) and game went into farming. And not much changed since then, sides are like the same, war+ace are still in way bigger number than Phalanx-NWO, you still have a lot more MPP and allies and quess what. Still you need to go 2-3 vs 1 to have a chance at victory hehe ;) So if thats the case, bring it o7 We will fight

