[Phalanx] Letter to the WORLD

BLUE DOMINATION

[Phalanx] Letter to the WORLD | Tweet

Published in Slovenia - Political debates and analysis - 40 - 10 Jan 18 07:27

As I continue to see a lot of questionable statements about the geopolitical situation in the game right now, I want to talk about the few things. Those events are not necessarily connected only to Phalanx, but are used in a way to make us as a whole or as some of our members look bad.

http://clipart-library.com/images/8czrRMbdi.png

1. The deletion of Chile

First I want to congratulate the Chilean citizens for the way they are accepting what is happening â€“ with honor and without tears. This is something remarkable. I want to clear something out, though. You all say how the half of the world is against you right now. In general this may be announced as true, but letâ€™s look further into the last battle.

Here are the final stats of the all countries that participated in the fight for the last region of Chile:

https://image.prntscr.com/image/jtlR1w0JRZ2T2-G8M7kZrw.png

If we take a look at the countries below the top 4 participants on both sides, we may see that Indonesia received way less outside support for this battle. In top 4 of the participating countries on the side of Indonesia, there is only one country that is foreign to the conflict â€“ Poland (congratulations for the amazing and decisive amount of damage!). If we take a look at the top 4 on the side of 4, we will see 4 countries that are foreign to the conflict (congratulations for the amazing support in the battle to you as well, of course).

We can clearly see that the battle of Indonesia was won mainly by Indonesia, Peru and Malaysia â€“ countries that are local to the conflict and that didnâ€™t start it.Â The scramble in South America started when the conflict on the continent was initiated by Chile and Paraguay. This caused the separation of the countries. This lead to an opening for the countries outside of SA to enter in the war. This war was not started by us.

Congratulations to everyone else that participated one way or another into the battle as well!Â

This leads me to my second point:

2. Phalanx and SA

As for why Phalanx decided to intervene in South America and why on this side, a lot of things can be said. A lot of things were discussed with both TA and South America. I wonâ€™t touch into this, as it will start a useless argument.

Where we were in that battle of Indonesia and Chile? There was some support from our alliance in the battle, but clearly not really decisive. Of course this doesnâ€™t mean we didnâ€™t fought against the TA alliance. We fought in the battle of Malaysia, we fought in Sistan etc., mainly against China. You can say that it is normal when we fight China, some of their damage to be diverted from the other fronts. Yes, itâ€™s perfectly true and normal. We fought against China so we can divert some of their focus on the first place and secondly to inflict some further damage to them in a multitude of other ways.

Well now itâ€™s normal. Was it normal when a good bunch of the countries in TA right now fought against a member of Phalanx so this member canâ€™t help the other members of Phalanx and at the end to be separated
from Phalanx?

3. The multi polarity of the world

Everything that is happening right now, my friends, you wanted to happen. You donâ€™t know how? You were disgusted by the bad bipolarity of the world, most recently when WAR was still alive. It was boring, it didnâ€™t allow interesting strategic conflicts and so on. The bipolarity of the world was intentionally destroyed.

The new groups of countries that were born from the ashes of it were connected not just to one group, but to countries from multiple groups. Of course this leads to some conflicts of interests, some new friendships, destroying of old onesâ€¦

At one point of time the game was officially divided into three groups â€“ PHALANX, TA, Croatia and the countries around them. In the conflict of South America the two main sides were Croatia and the countries around them, and TA. Yes, it was true that Phalanx had relations with countries on the both sides. On paper we could stand in between and support both of the groups on different fronts. But, there are some things that are wrong with it:

1. Nor Croatia and the countries around them, nor TA were going to agree on long-term cooperation with Phalanx in that way. It is obvious neutral position on two chairs which falsely supports everyone while in reality just negates the impact of Phalanx on both sides. This was not going to be acceptable nor for the other countries, nor for Phalanx as we are not female genital organs (we all love them, though).

2. Different countries in Phalanx to support different sides in this conflict is possible on paper, but was going to lead to division in Phalanx, internal conflicts and bad consequences for our team work and team spirit. Thatâ€™s why we decided to forge a mutual position of our alliance that respects all our members and their view on both of the sides.

I want to say some other things as well, but I will leave it for another time as this is already going to be really long and few people will read it. Expect another article at one point of time that will continue dissecting the world situation if it is interesting for the community.

Secretary General of Phalanx,
danider

Support

Macolar El Tarlo lonely wolf n4nox tripzahh CelioMG Janez Grozni Dipa Nusantara Makarov Makarov Bohemias

Comments (40)

10 Jan 18 07:30

Polilogas

Vote!

10 Jan 18 07:39

El Greco

La chancla pou 8elei kai vote o bulgayros :pose: zhtw h kina o/

10 Jan 18 07:40

Hitman79

Thanks Un soldado un amigo una amistad

10 Jan 18 07:41

n4nox

10 Jan 18 07:43

zebosk

new letter in spam folder. purge.

10 Jan 18 07:45

baubau

You make a good article when you dont write any. So I am wondering why you are still talking trash.

10 Jan 18 07:55

Evans

I didn t get the point. Spam

10 Jan 18 07:55

Manduco

Sorry not meaning to troll or anything but I dont get the message.

10 Jan 18 07:56

SirDaniderVulkan

Sorry, not meaning to be rude, but I don t give a damn whether you see the message, the point, the sens or whatever :sweat_smile:

10 Jan 18 07:58

Lord Kurupi

Dani my boy, this war started way before, tonight we ll talk about that in bed. I love you.

10 Jan 18 07:59

Inarius

10 Jan 18 08:01

Manduco

Again not trolling but if you dont give a damn then why publish it at all. Im not criticizing any decision you make, its just that the message isnt clear of what you are trying to say.

10 Jan 18 08:04

Inkisitorman

Nice post keep it like that

10 Jan 18 08:06

SirDaniderVulkan

The only wrong thing in the article is that I addressed the whole TA for something that not the whole TA did, but as you are together now, it s not really a mistake. There s an introduction that leads to a clear statement about something you or some of you did, and something that describes the environment in which Phalanx took its decisions. So there is actually a message. As you don t seem to resonate with it, I removed the address to you in the headlin, to avoid unneeded discussion. Sorry, that I challenged you that much, won t happen again, be sure.

10 Jan 18 08:06

N4zGuL

i tried to read objectively since i dont know the details as much as i tried the only clear thing is that your article is about bs people :P Sorry xD

10 Jan 18 08:08

Manduco

Ok thx for the response

10 Jan 18 08:08

Jjperdido

I agree with Manduco the message is not clear, or even if it is understood who is really addressed.

10 Jan 18 08:10

GioZombie

the truth ... you are too stupid to write you should go to school instead of playing the little tanks.

10 Jan 18 08:10

SirDaniderVulkan

Yes, I really enjoy the literature lesson this turned into and the fact that only people coming out of TA don t really get it. I will make sure to write some points for the next time so I do better. Thank you, like I said, it won t happen again, I will find something better to write for that will be understood easier :D

10 Jan 18 08:12

borja123

10 Jan 18 08:16

Dipa Nusantara

Good article danider :)

10 Jan 18 08:28

KrstaVB

,, 1. Nor Croatia and the countries around them, nor TA were going to agree on long-term cooperation with Phalanx in that way. You mean on Phalax desition to be neutral in wars in South America?

10 Jan 18 08:29

Valuk

YET ANOTHER EDEN PROPAGANDA!

10 Jan 18 08:32

SirDaniderVulkan

@Krle, I guess at the point of things happening it was about SA, but neutrality in general is not good in my eyes. Nothing good can come out of it for the game and the people that play it.

10 Jan 18 08:35

IonutO

OK @danider i give up...just tell me where did you hide the message cause i do not see it...or i`m too dumb to see it (:thinking)

10 Jan 18 08:36

Makarov

10 Jan 18 08:37

SirDaniderVulkan

I gave enough explanations. If someone cannot see what it is about as it concerns one of the major moves that was done in the game, I can t help it :D

10 Jan 18 08:41

El Gran COLPHO

so whats this article about? i dont see the point!

10 Jan 18 08:41

Zakk Bloodworth

10 Jan 18 08:54

Ahuaman

V+S

10 Jan 18 08:55

Ulysses Grant

We are too blind to see the truth. Danider, please enlighten us, unworthy ones.

10 Jan 18 09:01

SirDaniderVulkan

You are enlightened enough to understand, you atleast, I hope so.. if not GG WP

10 Jan 18 09:30

Profesor X

What?

10 Jan 18 10:12

Frida K

1. Nor Croatia and the countries around them, nor TA were going to agree on long-term cooperation with Phalanx in that way. It is obvious neutral position on two chairs which falsely supports everyone while in reality just negates the impact of Phalanx on both sides. This was not going to be acceptable nor for the other countries, nor for Phalanx as we are not female genital organs (we all love them, though). This is simply not true.