ã€CHINA PRã€‘About the (possible) update

Mad Feathah

Demiurge

ã€CHINA PRã€‘About the (possible) update | Tweet

Published in China - Political debates and analysis - 3 - 23 Mar 18 02:17

Kind regards fellow players,

There has been a lot of debate (both IGM and on Discord) concerning the new strategic buildings. Right of the bat, I will skip the easy route: insert-random-joke-about-the-pills, since there is more than enough players going down that road, and talk about pros and cons.

https://www.clker.com/cliparts/J/a/9/V/O/N/tablets-md.png

PROS
You have actually bothered to ask the community about their respected opinions. I will not get into details with this, because the act itself is a positive step forward (no matter what the topic is about). This should be a standard practice about any (possible) changes to the game.

CONS
You are adding a new feature to an already unsteady economy. This is not my strong suit, but I know that the new buildings will create waves, both in economy and in overall power balance of our simulation. You might be wondering why I put this under -cons-. Simply put: I doubt that anyone from the brass has seriously considered the impact of introducing such changes to the game. As it stands now, I can only see it as a yet another way to drain gold from the game (hence, creating the increased demand). We can all make an educated guess what methods will some of the players use for obtaining them: RL currency, cheating, scamming..etc.

That is all folks. I have tried to avoid unnecessary clutter and stick to the main points (IMHO, ofc).

--------

by XooKaip3

Support

Galadrael Vukan Nemanic lonely wolf Republic of Macedonia

Comments (3)