Jejeje

supported..

Lets have fun boyzzz

supported

o7

Voted.. o7

supported

unsub

bana para verin

You assumed that every member will write *in quality*. Who will decide about its quality? You want people to write but You left not many topic to write xD but.. good luck.

@franky the rest of the members will decide ,no worries there is honor between the members

@franky well my english fails me. when I say quality I mean articles that contains some good work. Not the country advertisements or just things like ADD RAPA NUI etc

*General idea behind this organization is to award players who write in quality*, then *Every vote will be equal to 2cc and the amount will be calculated by a formula*. I see two flaws here. #1 votes will be accumulated over a prolonged time, how long will you wait until tallying up the votes? #2 definition of quality is moot, as articles with nothing but a youtube link or a single image can stack up to a hundred votes, while actual written articles holding crucial content that took time and effort to make can go unnoticed and get no more than 20 votes.

@NightKing ofcourse you are right. for you first question, the vote count will be stopped when the article expires which is in 2 days from its publishing time. for your second question, thats why we restricted the topics. for example meme articles that have less vote than 30 wont get paid. This limit can be increased in time. Also I gotta say that with current situaiton players who put lots of effort in their article getting nothing except that 20 votes that you mentioned. With us at least they will get paid some.

@Terminon, i know what honor means, but there is thin line between good article and sort of propaganda article. @BosniakTurk, sometimes add Rapa Nui article gives more fun to readers than wall of text. No media modul concerns me as much as You guys. But giving gold to someone when there are no readers is pointless. I ll give You example on Ulysses articles. He used to published statistics. I think we all agree it was great work and topic was interesting for whole edom community. He took 755cc from his last article. Is it enough? No. But it s not bad either. He published once a month. Would it be so interesting if he published once a week? I don t think that he had enough time to do that, secondly statistics from one week won t show desirable perspective of subject. In my opinion writer like Ulysses should ask for money (f.ex. 1k cc from readers). Without support he won t publish new one. In my scenario we improve journalism from its roots. Readers. In Your scenario You can t write warfare analysis, which in my opinion is salt of journalism. If we want to keep players in game, they must be briefed to know what s really going on. So i wish You good luck, but i can t fit in Your frame...

S320 + V28

@franky yes maybe battle analysis should be allowed but we are just 3 players who trying to some things in here. We just asking for your opinions and we are getting it. Things can be change in time. In the end these are not strict rules. So keep sharing your opinions, help us to improve. We are not asking more than that.

@BosniakTurk, i think You were inviting writers to become members o/O one more thing. What about multi? I ve seen many articles (some of them were *good quality*) and bunch of multies supporting it with hundreds or even thousands of cc. Writer will get cc from his multies and even more gold from You guys. It distorts You idea.

@franky if someone wants to make articles and then multies to vote etc then be it ...we did this to motivate ourselves and whoever wants to write...we will pay even if they are multi votes

@franky well he will be able to do that once a week and I think we can relize that if that happens all in all this game have really small community and yes we are inviting people too, more people among us means more payment that publisher get. If he writes regularly than good for him, if he dont then he gotta pay without any income from us and if he/she fails to do it then it s bb time. You have to understand that this is just a start even we dont know how things will work, consider this as an alpha test for a game. We wil change stuff in time according to our experiences and I really cant see any bad things about it. Dont get me wrong tho I respect your opinions.

If it s all about motivation You have my vote xD i should say **challange accepted** but i don t know if i have enough time to compete with You guys. But it motivates me to do it xD

@franky thx mate hahaha

supported

Naisuuuuuu

no better quality articles than warders. no warder no vote no endorse

@zebosk we invited him. he didnt interested

No warder no support

Good luck !