Published in Paraguay
- Social interactions and entertainment - 27 - 01 Aug 18 14:20
Support
The GodfatherApokalucho92Evil MortyAbrameIinAbrameIinAbrameIinAbrameIinVaderCuraitoCuraitoeDominations WikiLEGIONFranConejoZeparEl TarloErikVSr IkiComments (27)









I would like to see more balanced wars as well, but i’ll give You examples why Your system isn’t good enough. Firstly, why do You expect that someone will fight against his allies for 0 mpp country, or even for enemies of his allies? Ok, other things. A with 10 allies (70% of global damage) fighting with B with 18 mpps (30% of global damage). A picks 6 allies to have 50%. Other 4 allies of A country do some training wars without weaps. On second day You have 60% of global damage on A side and 40% on B side. A side can pick two more allies who did training war. Because B couldn’t win and no perspective to win either they skip next battles and do not fight at all. On third day You have 90% of damage on A side, and 10% on B side. On fourth day A country can pick only one ally, other nine are bored and do some training wars without weaps. B side decide to win and take initiative or… still avoid fighting. Sounds familiar. Ok, so B wants to win this time. They pick all 18 allies and fight against A. Battle becomes epic. B wins. On fifth day A can pick all 10 allies (40%) and B have to send away 4 allies from 18, to let them fight some boring training wars. I don’t get the point of Your plan. And You punish countries who are better organized, or at least have better diplomacy. Maybe we should implement Master of Diplomacy medal (2g) when diplomacy for side B is on permanent vacations?

Franky... you need read again (you did not understand anything), and is much better than 70% vs 30% every day with 0 control :D... An that what you call Good diplomacy is just be a PET... used by mpp to fight all vs 1 or 2 and kill the game.

Ok, maybe i dont understand Your update, but You dont understand me at all. Its much more better to use diplomacy than force admins to change rules for You. Ireland and Chile used to have mpp, we were friends. I hope we still are. However, its You who changed side to opposite. We couldnt follow You, Colombia or Paraguay because most of our friends remains on this side. Did You ever try to chat with me about balance in game? I tell You something. NONE of countries from Your side (exAegis block) tried to talk about future with us. So please, dont tell me about imbalance ingame because im getting tired of this subject.

I dont count **hi Man, please help us** or **whats up, do You want to sign MPP?** as real approach to talkings about the future.

Solo paso a figurar.. no entendi ni una wuea perol las minas estan ricas wn. Aahhhh kxero xapala




Are you serious?!!! With all the recent stupid radical changes within days made numerous players leave, game is already dead! and yet here u r proposing another brilliant idea. Congrats.

And say no to dictatorship! Any country has the freedom to choose its MPP. and can sign 200 if ahe wants to!


I dont know good English or Spanish but since these photos help me understand i fully agree with that !


Con esto matas la diplomacia, de que te sirve currarte una buena diplomacia, si por cada pais aliado que consigas vas a tener desventajas

tried to read but made the mistake to scroll down! then i saw the photos! then i forgot how to read..! send audio message or send her for massage! whatever is easier!

Selection of MPPs in wars seems like a bad idea, then smaller countries would draw the short end of the stick because nobody would sign with them and even if they would, MPP wouldnt be selected because of low damage potential. Better would be if MPP limit would be set altogether, something like 10 MPPs and thats it.


Well its an idea and those are always good. But this one would be open to so much manipulation, it does not solve problems, but create new ones.

Skyce123... Diplomacia, de que te sirve si matas el juego? aaaa lo das vuelta y vas a otro y eres ganador?....Es un juego de guerra no de converzar y tomar cafe..........XIONIS smart Crack :D...... Enigma, please see your mpps list first, (https://www.edominations.com/en/battlefield/9713/1 any option for tunisia??... as here, you shoul select at least 1 or 2 mpp to attack, and any player can figth for tunisia, that gives to tunisia at least more chances you to should spend more damage to get the bonus)........Reypelayo, pobre animal..........KockaSi, in this moment manipulation cant be higher, the thing is... Smal country sign mpp with A or B, C didnt exist because C is the looser side, A is far but concentrate 70% dmg in mpp, B is near and also concentrate 70% dmg in his side, C cant win us signing whit A or B so, who cares about C.... and you have more damage in you side and other country farming.