pole

o7 Well written m8, well written.

v+s game needs more stats articles

wait, this is a world war? kinda boring

Well according to the data above, I see that the anti-phalanx side is approximately 50% stronger. correct line: Well according to the data above, I see that the anti-phalanx side has 20% more damage power and 20% more soldiers (440.000 more soldiers and 12.6M more damage power). from 20% to 50% is a little overstatement ;)

50 procent compared to whole population or anti phalanx side Zebost ;) You need to clear that out, other wise your statement is strang.

Didnt know,Hungary has got this much damage,thanks. Voted.

very intresting data , well for us it was worse , imagine having phalanx and axis agains u :P

interesting yes. liked

agla .

Sub de la pole

Why brazil is considered anti phalanx? Not that they are pro phalanx or anything, I just don’t think they are anti-something. Aside from that, no problems by my side, I still think phalanx has kind of an edge due to farming for last 10 months, and the economical and energy-wise advantage that came with it, while it was mostly axis side fighting against ta-ex ta. And even it can be kinda deceiving, anti phalanx side has ~50% more raw damage power COMPARED to phalanx side.

The game needs more statistic.. o7

usa-bra-bol-col these are not anti-phalanx side , did u see any dmg from these countries ? and my article was not about who won who loose, it was only for nerds, now you are trying to justify your causes. and if u wanna calculate the economical power, you should calculate the last 9 days donations + treasure counts

@zebosk I do not understand where is the mistake. 37,7m is with 50% more then 25.06m..maybe I am missing something, please explain it again here or on pm if you have the time for it so i can correct if i am wrong. @Ikta I simply follewed their MPP and saw that out of the 6b dmg they dealt in past 7 days, found 2 guys alone that together did about 2.5b against Argentina in their recent wars, others also hit some good hits(about 1b) against Indonesia, thats why i placed them in the more anti-phlanx side then on a neutral position even if you may be right and they are officially neither pro or anti anyone, their damage still counts against one side. @bybatu bol-col-usa did hit some decent damage against argentina and indonesia in plenty battles, it is hard for me to believe they do it from a neutral stance, you can find a lot of examples like battle 10104,10173,10200,10232 and a lot more others if you just watch them one by one. Also all their NE are set against Argentina, Indo, Romania, Slovenia..so its pretty obvious which side they support i think. About calculating more days I just explained you in the article why it cant be done from the position of a simple player like ourselves. Nevertheless, all I did was add some numbers, fell free to form your own opinion.

CC income is largely based on active population, meaning all the people there working their raw companies, as theyre a big part of the taxes. While market can play a big part of income, not a lot of people use it to place their airs and so on, as they prefer black market. Better way to consider about income is the amount of MUs created in the country. Id guess 99% of them have been used for orgs already, and theyre the only way you can count somehow the power of a country. Ofcourse, it still doesnt take into account plp that have the org in that country may have already left (example: phoenix were in China and have a lot of chinese MUs for orgs, but now theyre in different countries). Still, I consider it better way than counting taxes income.

Never ignoringđ.

Well all things considered, CC income is still pure country income, and is the easiest and safest to determine a basic level of development of each country so it still has some relevance I think. Counting the MUs can be one thing but its impossible to quess which MU has simple ORG, double ORG, triple ORG or no ORG at all, as well as what companies those ORGs contains, if the owner is the country itself or if it belongs to private investor. Just too many unknown variables. I can also ignore this CC income if all consider it to be that unreliable, its just hard to come with something that can replace it better.

for exmp TR has min 9K cc income but , we do 2k Refund :) so its not reality

I would like you to give me straight answer only on one question, I see that you like making tables, calculate me next. Phalanx+Axis dmg against Py-Col-Chi and then tell me, why da fu*k you all cry now about unbalance???

You should clear your eyes then, since nobody is crying anywhere as far as I can see, this its just an informative article about the situation this days, not about past x months or about future predictions. Just present situation as accurate as I could get it with the infos I had at hand.

where were you to present situation last month? your article is just reaction on bybatu article, he showed how much you lost and now you try to justify it with difference in dmg and gold/cc income, you cant, and there is still no answer on my question, and yea you cry...

Nope, bybatu just showed the results of the the battles in this war, I showed some behind the war factors that lead to that results. Simple as that. And regarding to what you say, it is not my job to present the case of everyone everytime, you could have done it yourself if you really wanted to do it. Ulyses used to do such articles some time ago, way better ones than this one to be honest, so there will be something to remain as a written mark in history, but instead you just complained on the feed back then

This qin has PMS :o

this is just the natural order of things, the wining side never cares about the losing side, there is no such thing as balance, we didnt fought in the phalanx invasion for 2 motives, 1 was Colombia needed help and we dont forget our allies, second was the circumstances that lead to that war, after TA disbanded we contanted Phalanx leadership and announced we would like to change our path into neutrality, we were answered with invasion with the pretext of giving phalanx and axis a common enemy to fight, words of your HQ members not mine, so we just refused to play into our enemy tactic, simple isnt it?

The game needs more statistic.. o7 x2

at beginning of your article its written ,,After I saw the article bybatu wrote, called Numbers For NERDS!,, so its clearly your reaction on his article, thats a 1st, 2nd I asked you to make table of dmg as you did nice job with this article so we can all enjoy one more of your master peaces (you wont do it cuz you are hypocrite), 3rd I have never complained about anything on feed, I hate when ppl do that, this is game and we have to play in situation we are putted at, best way we know. as for you @motonela69 write from your main if you dare damn multi

@Marcial fair enough. Qui I told you 3 times now, this article is a mirror of the present situation, if you want to do for 1-2-3 months ago you are free to do it, nobody will stop you.

pole

We have better Diplomacy than you now.Deal with it

Very interesting article mate!!

Interesting. Would be important to get the same numbers from the day the war started. It i possible that they might have changed some due to the course of the war and some countries loosing their bonuses. Besides that, I think its good that this types of articles are made (although they do need some more days to make the sample more viable).

good article .....but i like bybatu article more.....game need more statics.....but i think its not real power for some countries:))))

Cheap propaganda !!!

Bronce

The wars in this game have never been fair so far so nothing new there The Phalanx + Axis (or Phalaxis as you all so loved to call us) against China was because China consistently ditched allies for stronger ones until everybody abandoned them to fight them. Current war is mostly because of what you could effectively call PTO of Poland than anything else and everybody that got the short end of the stick during Phalanx strong times jumped on the bandwagon.

PTO of Poland. xD

Enigma your ability to lie allways amuses me, dont know if you trully belive that or its just trash propaganda but if you do your are delusional, what a small man, the amount of insults that sentance generates in my mind is enough to make me go banned but you are just not important enough, go back to your cave

v+s

What war.. wait.. theres a war?

Lool. Did you counted damage when all of you were hitting against iran-china-georgia?.

Marcial i dont know whwich part you think is a lie, if you are talking about China war then granted it wasnt just ditching the allies that got you, you were generally unpleasant country and people were more than happy to jump on that bandwagon when it came by. If you are calling effective PTO of Poland a lie, then let me just say that when Judges came out, Poland wasnt even able to punish people hitting against its interests, because there were so many foreigners in the country by that time.

You call 7 chinese a lot of people? Retard is what you are and yes we never ditched allies. Unlike some other people that used our damage and made very sick propaganda possible o turn us into the enemy. There is no need to bs me mate i know the truh from the mouth of your leaders try to influence someone else

War is couse of deflection, I accepted China players only to play on Deflection nerves. Deflection made Poland and Turkey angry on Phalanx. Anyway crying about disadvantage its pointless. U know what could happen when u kicked us from Phalanx channel on discord. U could arrange new aliances or play nice to axis countries. U thouogh we r ur puppets. 3-4 countries from phalanx r wiped now xD.